Skip to main content

FEATURED ARTICLE: Are you prepared if the worst happens?

12th November 2019

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

NCEC’s Ian McDiarmid discusses emergency response and the CEFIC Guidelines for Level 1 Chemical Emergency Response

Most legislators require organisations to provide an emergency telephone number on transport documentation and safety data sheets (SDS) before they can be distributed. Typically, regulations are established at national level, so the conditions of their implementation vary from country to country. This has an impact on the practical aspects of the emergency telephone number requirement – such as the language spoken, if it is a local or international number, or if the number is available 24/7.

To avoid the commercial or legal implications of non-compliance, those transporting or supplying hazardous goods must ensure that the emergency telephone numbers they provide meet the requirements of every country in which they operate. Requirements for emergency telephone numbers are sometimes defined in a country’s dangerous good regulations.

However, more often, the requirement is due to the implementation of the Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) and national SDS regulations. In addition to the various national requirements, a 24-hour emergency telephone number is required when transporting hazardous chemicals by air. While many companies view emergency response services simply as a way to achieve regulatory compliance, the more forward-thinking organisations are driven to invest in emergency response services for the following reasons:

* To protect people, the environment, assets and reputation (PEAR) from the effects of an incident

* To reduce the scale and cost of incidents.

* To demonstrate commitments to corporate social responsibility (CSR) and Responsible Care

NCEC receives over 8,000 calls/year on its emergency helplines. Of these, approximately 10% are categorised as medium-sized incidents and up to 1% are categorised as severe, high-consequence incidents. Over a two-year period, a company is almost certain to experience at least one medium-sized incident during the lifecycle of its products (on site, during transport or in use), resulting in significant cost. Studies audited and confirmed by independent third parties and the UK Department for Transport reveal that an effective response to a chemical incident can deliver a potential return on investment of 15 to 1.

As chemical markets grow and supply chains become more complex, the risk of a major chemical incident become statistically greater. As a result, more and more companies are choosing to invest in robust, professional emergency response to ensure the long-term viability of their business, and the protection of their stakeholders and the wider community.

CEFIC guidelines

The CEFIC guidelines were introduced in July 2018 and were intended to establish best practice guidelines for Level 1 (remote information and general advice) emergency response providers. This was the first time that the chemical industry had a clear indication of what an effective emergency response system should look like.

The guidelines were also introduced in complete accordance with the Responsible Care guiding principle ‘To work with customers, carriers, suppliers, distributors, and contractors to foster the safe and secure use, transport and disposal of chemicals and provide hazard and risk information that can be accessed and applied in their operations and products’.

For all chemical incidents, the first requirement from emergency services or other callers is rapid access to accurate advice concerning the chemical involved or the actual and potential hazards posed by the chemical when contained or accidentally released. During serious incidents and those involving more dangerous chemicals with specific hazards, there is often the need for rapid, product-specific, detailed advice (e.g. advice about the hazards created by the product in a fire or when released to the environment). This is the type of information that should be available and can be reasonably expected from a responsible company.

The CEFIC guidelines apply to national Intervention in Chemical Transport Emergencies (ICE) centres and other providers of Level 1 emergency response services. Level 1 may be provided by the chemical manufacturer, the ICE National Centre (Europe) or another organisation, such as NCEC, or via a coordinated effort by several organisations.

How to prepare

The guidelines serve to illustrate best practice. As such, responsible companies should use the guidelines to gauge the effectiveness of their existing emergency response arrangements. This will enable them to identify any areas of potential weakness and risk associated with their current emergency response system, apply corrective actions and ensure preparedness.

The guidelines form the basis of an ‘ideal’ Level 1 emergency response provision. They are an essential measure for companies involved in the manufacture, management and distribution of chemicals to ensure their systems have suitable features to support a fast and effective emergency response intervention. Their most important features are:

* Availability of emergency number at all times

* Advice in the local language

* Connection to advice in 3-5 minutes

* Access to expert network

* Knowledge of chemicals and chemical behaviour

* Advice tailored to the circumstances of the incident

* Tactical awareness

* Regulatory awareness

Ultimately, companies should already have analysed and understood the potential risks inherent in dealing with chemicals. CEFIC’s guidelines will provide the perfect benchmark by which companies can evaluate their ability to manage chemical incidents, stop them escalating and, ultimately, protect their own long-term future and hard-earned reputations.

CONTACT

NCEC

+44 (0)1235 753654

[email protected]

www.the-ncec.com/specialitychemicals-er

Feature article – Saltigo rides out the cycle

Market and sustainability trends are positive drivers for Saltigo, despite the agro downturn. Andrew Warmington met up with the new CEO at Chemspec Europe

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

UPL to split out specialities

Indian agrochemicals giant UPL has announced plans to transfer its speciality chemicals business, including agrochemical active ingredient (AI) manufacturing to its wholly owned subsidiary UPL Spec

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

Nippon Shokubai opens Indonesian plant

Japan’s Nippon Shokubai has officially opened a 100,000 tonnes/year acrylic acid (AA) plant that was built at a cost of about $200 million at Cilegon, Banten, Indonesia.

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

CABB to invest at Finnish agro site

The CABB Group has said that it will invest over €50 million by 2025 to expand facilities at its agrochemical manufacturing site in Kokkola, Finland.

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

AI for SAPs

Together with Algo Artis, Japan’s Nippon Shokubai has developed an algorithm-based means for the production planning of superabsorbent polymers (SAPs) based on acrylic acid, and has started operati

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

adcs

Three invest further into ADCs

Three CDMOs have separately announced expansions in their antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) manufacturing capabilities and capacity on opposite sides of the Atlantic.

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

Cambrex exits drug product

CDMO Cambrex has sold its Drug Product business unit to Noramco. Terms were not disclosed.

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

Siegfried breaks ground on R&D centre

Siegfried has broke ground for its new global R&D centre for drug substances at its site in Evionnaz, Switzerland.

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

Drug product centre opens

Following two years of construction work, CDMO Siegfried has officially opened its new development centre for drug products at its sites in Barberà del Vallès and El Masnou near Barcelona.

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

Evonik realigns Health Care

In order to “maximise customer centricity and market focus” and continue an ongoing transition into “a system solutions partner for the pharmaceutical and biotech industries”, Evonik has divided it

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

First waste-based biosurfactants

Belgian start-up AmphiStar has launched what it claims are the first fully upcycled biobased surfactants under the trade names AmphiCare and AmphiClean.

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

Aether to supply Seqens

Indian firm Aether Industries has entered into a manufacturing agreement with Chemoxy International, a UK-based subsidiary of Seqens.

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

New model for biocatalysts

BASF, the Austrian Research Centre of Industrial Biotechnology (ACIB) and the University of Graz in Austria have co-developed a computer-assisted regression model to improve enzyme performance and

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

CBE JU funds 31 more projects

The Circular Bio-based Europe Joint Undertaking (CBE JU), a €2 billion partnership between the EU and the Bio-based Industries Consortium (BIC) that funds projects advancing competitive circular bi

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

Investment in Tanasote plant

Octowood, a part of the Sweden’s Rundvirke Industrier Group, has invested in a new treatment plant using Arxada’s wood preservative, Tanasote.

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

Rhamnolipid milestone reached

Evonik has manufactured the first product from its industrial-scale biosurfactants facility at Slovenská Lupca in Slovakia.

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

Sudarshan to buy Heubach

India’s Sudarshan Chemical Industries (SCIL) has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire the Heubach Group in a move that it said would “create a global pigment company, combining SCIL’s ope

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

Lanxess to continue pigment production

Lanxess has reversed a decision to sell the chromium oxide pigments business at the Krefeld-Uerdingen site in Germany, preserving 50 jobs there.

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

Alliance in natural fragrances

Sensegen, a US-based specialist in biotech-enabled fragrances, notably a new class of natural musk raw materials, has announced a strategic collaboration with Japan’s Takasago, a large player in th

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

Croda breaks ground in China

Croda International has broken ground for a low-carbon, multi-purpose production facility on a greenfield site in Guangzhou. This triples its manufacturing capacity for fragrances and establis

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

CCT collaboration for Givaudan

Flavours and fragrances giant Givaudan has agreed a research collaboration for the development of sustainable fragrance ingredients from renewable carbon, with US-based LanzaTech, which describes i

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

Kao boosts jasmine fragrance

Japan's Kao Corporation is to double capacity for the synthetic fragrance methyl dihydrojasmonate (MDJ) at its site in Olesa, Spain, by adding a second production facility.

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

Merck KGaA “in a strong strategic position”

At its latest Capital Markets Day, Merck KGaA said that it is “in a strong strategic position” to profit from medium-term growth opportunities in all three of its business sectors after a transitio

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

Suez joins Global Impact Coalition

Suez, which describes itself as “a global leader in circular solutions for water and waste”, has joined the Global Impact Coalition (GIC).

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington

Chemours opens battery lab

Chemours has opened Chemours Battery Innovation Centre (CBIC) at the Chemours Discovery Hub in Newark, Delaware.

Submitted by:

Andrew Warmington